Target Reference Numbers Explained…

Hey boys and girls,

I gotta tell you, what I’m about to share with you wasn’t easy to pull off in such a short time period. But I’m glad it worked fast.

You see, after my last 3 videos which received a total of 284 com­ments so far, I received at least 103 ques­tions ask­ing “What is the Tar­get Ref­er­ence Number.”

So, to give you a really good answer, I wrote an email to Ed Dames and asked him to share with you a full explanation.

Here’s what he sent me back very promptly.

The Reply from Ed Dames:

The Tar­get Ref­er­ence Num­bers or TRNs is a sys­tem that assigns ran­dom num­bers (ref­er­ence num­bers) to a hid­den or blind  tar­get or ques­tion that you want to pro­vide to another Remote Viewer.

Since Remote View­ing unlocks the true power of the uncon­scious mind, the Remote Viewer in train­ing doesn’t need to know what the actual RV tar­get or ques­tion is; they sim­ply need to fol­low the pro­to­col using the TRNs as a pointer to the hid­den tar­get and allow their uncon­scious mind take care of the rest.

When a Remote Viewer hits a tar­get using this TRN sys­tem, it proves with­out any doubt that their mind has received the data at an uncon­scious level. The rea­son for using TRNs, espe­cially for begin­ners, is to elim­i­nate the chance of one inter­ject­ing per­sonal imag­i­na­tion or ana­lyt­i­cal over­lay into their data which can skew the ses­sion results. Think of TRNs as case num­bers for a fil­ing sys­tem, thus the name, “Tar­get Ref­er­ence Num­bers (TRNs)”.

When a stu­dent is achiev­ing  80% accu­racy or higher on blind tar­gets using TRNs, then one may choose to forge the TRN sys­tem and sim­ply run a tar­get front loaded. Front load­ing sim­ply means the Remote Viewer knows the ques­tion or tar­get before they start their session.

The for­mat of TRNs are from the orig­i­nal mil­i­tary pro­gram and are sim­ply ran­dom num­bers with no mean­ing other than being a pointer or ref­er­ence to the blind/hidden tar­get or ques­tion or being pro­vided to a viewer.

Isn’t that awesome?

Alright then, do leave other ques­tions you may have, and I’ll see what I can do to help.

I’m so happy I did that sur­vey. Had no idea so many of you weren’t aware about so much. But hey, bet­ter late than never.

Gotta run. Leave your ques­tions below.

Talk soon,
Michael

158 Responses to Target Reference Numbers Explained…
  1. jamy pol
    September 27, 2009 | 11:24 am

    i think i did use this tech­nik for quite a long time now and im design­ing our future with help from the past my entire invire­ment is the uncon­sious mind and its steer­ing me and let me become a galac­tic fed­er­a­tion off light member

  2. Gary
    September 27, 2009 | 1:20 pm

    Ihave no idea what remote­view­ing or TRN#s mean. Totally lost???

  3. Jackson
    September 27, 2009 | 1:24 pm

    Hi Michael, I firstly wanna say that what you are doing is great and much appre­ci­ated, you’re doing won­der­ful work. My que­sion is sim­ply, why are we assign­ing these TRN’s to a photo or cue site? I don’t assume we are doing this for oth­ers, so how does this work because if we assign it, then nat­u­rally we our­selves would know what the tar­get is and well, skew our results. So I’m con­fused. Thanks J

  4. anya
    September 27, 2009 | 1:27 pm

    why would you need a TRN when you are just a com­men per­son, not mil­i­tary, and when you know what the ques­tion is, and what you want to “look for”.…please explain why and who to addres this.

    peace

  5. Karen Lee Samson
    September 27, 2009 | 2:07 pm

    Michael,
    A beau­ti­ful Blog! I also went to the Mon­roe Insti­tute for a week of Exper­i­ments and Remote view­ing shared with us, this was sev­eral decades ago.…I love it all, I have many of the older Hemi-sync Cds and music and have used them with my ESE stu­dents in the past when stud­ies with Monre Insti­tute and effects on behav­iour were going on.….I have Silva as well, and I may be older yet I I am still learn­ing and enjoy­ing the process. As usual you always send excel­lent and won­der­ful infor­ma­tion.
    Karen

  6. Sir Bruce Segrum
    September 27, 2009 | 2:55 pm

    I’m Rv ing or R I ing my new BGF and it’s work­ing so well that I keep on get­ting invited over to din­ner. She’s only 29 years younger but not when I using the fourth dimen­tion to make con­tact there’s no age dif­fer­ence involved. Have you ever thought of that Vishen? No time influ­ence no age influ­ence just a great mind melt.
    Never mind the energy lost while con­cen­trat­ing her cook­ing is all I need to keep me going. :-)

  7. shahrzad
    September 27, 2009 | 3:36 pm

    hi, could you please tell me more about trn,
    I feel like I am lost.
    thanks

  8. Karen A. Wittner
    September 27, 2009 | 3:46 pm

    WOW! That was a fast answer!
    Thank you…Will make time for this, learn the skills, do it. Thank you for knowing!

    Karen A. Wittner

  9. John
    September 27, 2009 | 4:35 pm

    The TRN sys­tem Ed Dames uses is BRILLIANT! I’ve been to one of his work­shops and it proves that Remote View­ing really works because the whole class nailed the answet to a blind tar­get! I know that view­ers also pre­dict Super Bowl win­ners and stuff too.

  10. Jane
    September 27, 2009 | 4:48 pm

    Hi,
    I think I am kind of lost too with the tar­get num­bers. I can see if we were look­ing for a cer­tain area or look­ing for a job or a per­son or some­thing I can see that. But what makes these tar­get num­bers?
    Thank you again
    Jane

  11. Heather
    September 27, 2009 | 5:05 pm

    I was think­ing of try­ing to make TRNs for my own tar­gets (after I get more prac­tice, of course), but was unsure how. This source is great! Thanks!

    Maybe I can help? The TRN is a randomly-generated set of num­bers that who­ever is run­ning the ses­sion (could be your­self) assigns to the tar­get. We get num­bers instead of words as a tar­get to keep our con­scious mind from inter­fer­ing with the data col­lec­tion. Please cor­rect me if I’m wrong.

  12. Lisa Wallace
    September 27, 2009 | 6:06 pm

    Thank you. I dowloaded the work­sheets and got my TRNs. now, how do I find out if I am on tar­get? How do I find out what the TRNs refer to?
    Thank you, LW

  13. Steve
    September 27, 2009 | 6:47 pm

    If two dif­fer­ent peo­ple get the same tar­get ref­er­ence num­bers will they remote view the same tar­get?
    For instance if i want to remote view the face on Mars do i have to have the SAME Tar­get Ref­er­ence Num­bers already assi­gend to that spot? Same for other times / places in his­tory.
    Thanks
    Steve

  14. korgie
    September 27, 2009 | 7:03 pm

    does this only work it you are try­ing to FIND some­one? What if you want to ask a ques­tion, like what job should i pur­sue? or Career path? OR am I on the right track? How do I help myself become more suc­cess­ful creatively?

  15. Ramon
    September 27, 2009 | 7:12 pm

    I under­stand if your doing blind tar­get but what if it’s per­sonal like what I should be doing as a career or best way to make money in this time

  16. james finch
    September 27, 2009 | 8:17 pm

    Thankyou Friend

  17. Kathy Madigan
    September 27, 2009 | 9:28 pm

    I too have had spon­ta­neous RV expe­ri­ences as a young per­son and have been immensely inter­ested in more for­mal work. The TRN’s are a nec­es­sary part of mak­ing this sci­en­tific. Thanks for hav­ing this site.

  18. Viking.
    September 27, 2009 | 9:29 pm

    Hi all
    I am a new­bie to RV,but I would think that TRN sim­ply mean your own ref. number,just like, as if you get an account and make a query, they ask for the Ref. num­ber and then they know what account it is, your sub­con­sioue Mind aparently need a Ref. num­ber too, for each sub­ject, but I don’t under­stand blind tar­gets, I thought RV was a way to get an answer to a spe­sific ques­tion you have.
    Great­ings from Australia.

  19. HealingMindN
    September 27, 2009 | 9:37 pm

    I get it. It works like radion­ics. By sub­sti­tut­ing numero­logic val­ues for let­ters and doing a Pythagorean reduc­tion, we can tune into a per­son. The same must be true even when assign­ing a ran­dom value under the “TRN” sys­tem. I learned how to tune in a per­son from Stew­art Swerd­low, but he never called it RV.

  20. George
    September 27, 2009 | 10:19 pm

    Ok Michael!
    I have my TRN #s but then what? Please help me out or bet­ter yet help us out here. What is the next step.…
    The new kid on the block is confused.….

  21. E
    September 27, 2009 | 10:19 pm

    I would guess you don’t need to gen­er­ate a TRM if you’re an indi­vid­ual doing pri­vate RM for your own use.

    Speak­ing of the method­ol­ogy for gen­er­at­ing unique TRM’s, I’ve always won­dered if major sweep­stakes that send a van full of well-dressed peo­ple with bal­loons to give you astro­nom­i­cal fig­ures like $10M that would bank­rupt most cor­po­ra­tions, use the TRM gen­er­a­tor described in this arti­cle? In this case the pro­gram would track every entry and choose a ran­dom num­ber out­side the range of entry num­bers? That way, they never have to pay out (except maybe once every decade). I dunno, just a side thought…

  22. Marsha Hall
    September 28, 2009 | 4:56 am

    His­toy of Projects

    Cen­ter Lane
    Cen­ter Lane was the code­name for the oper­a­tional unit of the remote-viewing pro­gram, redes­ig­nated from Grill Flame in late 1983.

    Con­trol of the unit shifted from INSCOM’s oper­a­tion group to the more direct con­trol of Albert Stub­blebine. The unit was known as INSCOM Cen­ter Lane Project (ICLP).
    (Schn­abel, Jim, Remote View­ers: The Secret His­tory of America’s Psy­chic Spies, Dell, 1997, pg 280)

    In late 1983, four more indi­vid­u­als were recruited to Cen­ter Lane: Cap­tain Ed Dames, Cap­tain Bill Ray (coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence spe­cial­ist), Cap­tain Paul Smith, and Char­lene Cavanaugh (civil­ian ana­lyst with INSCOM). These four began a train­ing pro­gram, which began at The Mon­roe Insti­tute and con­cluded with per­sonal train­ing with Ingo Swann.
    (Schn­abel, 1997, pg 292–3)

    After Gen. Stubblebine’s retire­ment in 1984, Cen­ter Lane was com­pletely with­out sup­port in the Army. Jack Vorona arranged for the unit to be trans­ferred directly to the DIA’s Sci­en­tific and Tech­ni­cal Intel­li­gence Direc­torate when Army fund­ing ran out in late 1985, at which time it was redes­ig­nated Sun Streak. Until that time, the unit was given no offi­cial task­ings.
    (Schn­abel, 1997, pg 319)

    CENTER LANE started when Ingo Swann at SRI came across a break­through in his tech­niques in 1983. He devel­oped a train­ing pro­gram and trained six mil­i­tary offi­cers, includ­ing Ed Dames, over a period of six months. After fin­ish­ing the train­ing in late 1983, the view­ers returned and started apply­ing their knowl­edge. The unit was renamed CENTER LANE, with Dames as the oper­a­tions and train­ing officer.

    Dames took a ‘let’s see what this baby can do’ approach, replac­ing the unit’s for­mer intel­li­gence col­lec­tion method­ol­ogy with the break­through tech­nique.“
    (Dames, Ed“Ed Dames Sets the Record Straight”)

    Indi­vid­u­als asso­ci­ated with Cen­ter Lane include:

    * Lt. Col. Brian Busby: com­man­der, 1983–1984 or 85
    * Lt. Skip Atwa­ter: oper­a­tions offi­cer, 1978–87
    * Ed Dames: trainee, 1983–84, assis­tant oper­a­tions offi­cer, 1985–88
    * Joe McMonea­gle: viewer, 1978–84
    * Bill Ray: viewer, 1983–84/85. Com­man­der, 1984 or 1985
    * Paul Smith: viewer, 1983–1990
    * Char­lene Cavanaugh: viewer, 1983-?
    * Lyn Buchanan: viewer, mon­i­tor, 1984–92

    Gon­dola Wish
    Around 1977, Lt. Skip Atwa­ter of the Army’s Sys­tems Exploita­tion Detach­ment (SED), which was under con­trol of the office of the assis­tant chief of staff for intel­li­gence (ACSI), sug­gested to the head of the SED, Col. Robert Keenan, that the Army develop a small, exper­i­men­tal group of psy­chics. The sug­ges­tion passed up the chain of com­mand and was approved by the ACSI, Major Gen­eral Edmund Thompson.

    The project, which was code­named Gon­dola Wish, had a small bud­get, and began the plan­ning stages around late 1977. Lt. Atwa­ter was given some funds, some office space, and a com­mand­ing offi­cer, Lt. Scotty Watt. After con­sult­ing with the researchers at SRI, Atwa­ter and Watt began screen­ing pos­si­ble recruits. The new recruits were to serve only part-time, and remain offi­cially attached to their cur­rent units.
    The orig­i­nal recruits included:

    * Ken Bell, Army coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence
    * Fer­nand Gau­vin, Army coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence
    * Jackie Keith, civil­ian work­ing with Army spe­cial ops
    * Joe McMonea­gle, war­rant offi­cer
    * Mel Riley, photo-interpreter
    * Hartleigh Trent, photo inter­preter, Navy petty offi­cer
    * One unnamed Army cap­tain,
    * four unnamed civil­ian photo-interpreters

    Soon after Gon­dola Wish was staffed, by early 1978, they had con­ducted only a few remote view­ing ses­sions before the work was halted. The project was con­sid­ered to be “human use exper­i­men­ta­tion”, and the process of approval, con­sent, and med­ical eval­u­a­tions had to be com­pleted. Sev­eral months passed, and the six most promis­ing can­di­dates (Riley, McMonea­gle, Bell, Gau­vin, Trent, and one of the civil­ians) were sent to SRI to be eval­u­ated. Atwa­ter and Watt were look­ing for the best three can­di­dates, but all six seemed to fit the bill. Those that didn’t go through train­ing soon faded from the project.
    (Schn­abel, Jim, Remote View­ers: The Secret His­tory of America’s Psy­chic Spies, Dell, 1997, pg 13–20)

    Gon­dola Wish had the sup­port of Ed Thomp­son, who par­tic­i­pated in an exper­i­ment him­self, and to a lesser degree was sup­ported by INSCOM (Army Intel­li­gence and Secu­rity Com­mand) com­man­der William Rolya, as well as the Chief of Staff and the Secretry of the Army. Due to this inter­est, in 1978 Gon­dola Wish was moved into bet­ter quar­ters and redes­ig­nated Grill Flame. (Schn­abel, 1997, pg 23–5)

    GRILL FLAME
    In late 1978, Gon­dola Wish was redes­ig­nated as the “Spe­cial Action Branch”, code­named Grill Flame, which applied to the oper­a­tional unit and the research at SRI. The unit was reor­ga­nized as an offen­sive spy­ing unit, and moved into build­ings 2560 and 2561 at Ft. Meade. The bud­get was increased, and there were three full time view­ers: Ken Bell, Joe McMonea­gle, and Mel Riley. The unit reported to Ed Thomp­son, but was tasked by approved mem­bers of the intel­li­gence com­mu­nity.
    (Schn­abel, Jim, Remote View­ers: The Secret His­tory of America’s Psy­chic Spies, Dell, 1997, pg 24–5)

    The SRI research pro­gram was inte­grated into Grill Flame in early 1979. Con­trolled by the DIA, task­ing came through the DIA’s on-site rep­re­sen­ta­tive, Jim Salyer.
    (Scn­abel, 1997, pg 220–1)

    After Ed Thomp­son left his post in 1981, Grill Flame came under the con­trol of INSCOM, and was des­ig­nated Detach­ment G within INSCOM’s Oper­a­tions Group.
    (Schn­abel, 1997, pg 280)

    Accord­ing to Ed Dames, the orig­i­nal unit had six to eight com­mis­sioned mil­i­tary intel­li­gence offi­cers. “GRILL FLAME, (which was listed on the INSCOM books as “Detach­ment G”), had con­sisted of sol­diers and a few civil­ians who pos­sessed vary­ing degrees of nat­ural psy­chic abil­ity. These oper­a­tives uti­lized altered states to achieve (vary­ing degrees) of tar­get con­tact.“
    (Dames, Ed, “Ed Dames Sets the Record Straight”)

    In 1983, Grill Flame was redes­ig­nated Cen­ter Lane.

    Indi­vid­u­als asso­ci­ated with Grill Flame:

    * Jack Vorona: over­all man­ager
    * Lt. Col. Mur­ray B. “Scott” Watt: com­man­der, 1978–82
    * Lt. Col Jachim: com­man­der, 1982–83
    * Lt. Col. Brian Busby: com­man­der, 1983–
    * Lt. Skip Atwa­ter: oper­a­tions offi­cer, 1978–87
    * Ken Bell: viewer, 1978–82
    * Joe McMonea­gle: viewer, 1978–84
    * Mel Riley: viewer, 1978–81
    * Fern Gau­vin: viewer, 1978–81
    * Cap­tain Rob Cow­art: viewer, 1982–3
    * Hartleigh Trent: viewer 1978–83

    STAR GATE
    Code­name for the oper­a­tional unit of the DIAs remote view­ing pro­gram from approx­i­mately 1991 (redes­ig­nated from Sun Streak) until its ter­mi­na­tion in 1995. I have seen this code­name been used casu­ally by jour­nal­ists to describe the entire remote-viewing program.

    I have heard that at this time, the unit was no longer housed at Ft. Meade, but I don’t know when they left or where they went.

    Star Gate began around 1991, and had only four view­ers: Lyn Buchanan, Robin Dahlgren, Angela Del­lafiora, and a DIA civil­ian. No attempts were made to recruit new per­son­nel. The branch chief of Star Gate was Dale Graff. When Graff resigned in the sum­mer of 1993, he was replaced by a DIA HUMINT (human intel­li­gence) spe­cial­ist.
    (Schn­abel, Jim, Remote View­ers: The Secret His­tory of America’s Psy­chic Spies, Dell, 1997, pg 380–1)

    In 1994, there was an attempt to move Star Gate to the CIA’s Office of Research and Devel­op­ment. The CIA was reluc­tant to take the unit, but agreed under the con­di­tion of an out­side eval­u­a­tion, which was car­ried out by AIR. (Schn­abel, 1997, pg 386)

    AIR gave an unfa­vor­able report of the pro­gram, and the CIA set about shut­ting it down in 1995. Since then, there have been rumors that the project went deep black, or that the intel­li­gence com­mu­nity still funds some low-level psi research.

    Accord­ing to viewer Paul Smith, dur­ing Star Gate, the unit changed from a “SAP (‘Spe­cial Access Pro­gram’) to a LIMDIS (‘lim­ited dis­sem­i­na­tion’) program”.

    SUN STREAK
    After Army sup­port and fund­ing of the Ft. Meade oper­a­tional remote view­ing unit ran out in late 1985, Jack Vorona trans­ferred con­trol directly to the DIA’s Sci­en­tific and Tech­ni­cal Intel­li­gence Direc­torate. The unit was known as DT-S (DT for Sci­en­tific and Tech­ni­cal Intel­li­gence Direc­torate, S for Spe­cial) and was given the code­name Sun Streak.

    Under branch chief Fern Gauvin’s com­mand, the unit report­edly began to shift towards more occul­tic meth­ods, includ­ing chan­nelling and tarot cards.
    (Schn­abel, Jim, Remote View­ers: The Secret His­tory of America’s Psy­chic Spies, Dell, 1997)

    In 1986, the Army passed the highly con­tro­ver­sial unit to DIA. SUN STREAK (fer­reted away in DIA’s Sci­en­tific and Tech­ni­cal Intel­li­gence Direc­torate as DT-S), was a bas­tard ele­ment. This is because DIA is an ana­lyt­i­cal agency–it has no char­ter to col­lect intel­li­gence!” Ed Dames claims to have con­tin­ued to col­lect and pass on infor­ma­tion under the nose of the DIAs civil­ian admin­is­tra­tor, Dale Graff.

    By 1989, Dale Graff had replaced all of the trained mil­i­tary pro­fes­sion­als with psy­chics vir­tu­ally taken “off the street,” thus ren­der­ing the project inef­fec­tive for intel­li­gence col­lec­tion purposes–but highly enter­tain­ing for cer­tain civil­ian offi­cials who came to visit DIA’s ‘witches’ to obtain per­sonal psy­chic ‘read­ings.’”
    (Dames, Ed, “Ed Dames Sets the Record Straight”)

    In 1988, a Pen­ta­gon Inspec­tor Gen­eral team eval­u­ated the Sun Streak oper­a­tional unit. The view­ers were ordered to avoid the team, and many doc­u­ments were shred­ded behind the inspector’s backs (in the doc­u­men­tary “Psi-Files: The Real X-Files”, Ed Dames claimed that three shred­ders had their motors burnt out in the process).
    (Schn­abel, 1997, pg 369)

    By 1991, the unit had only four view­ers: Lyn Buchanan, Robin Dahlgren, Angela Del­lafiora, and a DIA civil­ian. Around this time, the unit was redes­ig­nated Star Gate. Also around this time period, the unit left Ft. Meade. I don’t know the date of the move, or where it was moved to.
    (Schn­abel, 1997, pg 380)

    Indi­vid­u­als asso­ci­ated with Sun Streak include:

    * Bill Ray: branch chief, 1985–1988
    * Bill Xenakis: branch chief, 1987–8
    * Skip Atwa­ter: oper­a­tions offi­cer, 1978–87
    * Ed Dames: assis­tant oper­a­tions offi­cer
    * Fern Gau­vin: assis­tant oper­a­tions offi­cer, 1985?-1987. Oper­a­tions offi­cer, 1987. Branch chief, 1988–1991?
    * Gene Kin­caid: assis­tant oper­a­tions offi­cer
    * Lyn Buchanan: viewer, mon­i­tor, 1984–92
    * Angela Del­lafiora: viewer, chan­neller: 1986–95?
    * David More­house: viewer, 1988–1990
    * Mel Riley: viewer, 1986–90
    * Paul Smith: viewer, 1983–90
    * Robin Dahlgren: viewer, chan­neller, 1988–95?
    * Paul Tyler: Navy Cap­tain, head of Sun Streak’s med­ical over­sight board, UFO enthusiast

  23. Ramith
    September 28, 2009 | 5:23 am

    Thanks MJ/VK for intro to this faci­nat­ing expe­ri­ence which I am eager to start asap.
    Are TRNs used to RV a par­tic­u­lar geo­graph­i­cal loca­tion in our uni­verse? If so, can I con­firm results a day or so later using the same TRN.
    Am I off the mark in my under­stand­ing so far?

  24. nasar hussain
    September 28, 2009 | 6:50 am

    hi michael
    i used the trn on your last video and wat i saw was some­thig fas­ci­nat­ing but if i men­tioned this on the com­ment peo­ple would think im crazy or im mak­ing it up could u advise me on how to com­muncate with you

    thank you

  25. jacob m BRUNo
    September 28, 2009 | 12:28 pm

    MR senior joe dude,
    I have gone through exper­i­ments with NAVY, DR RHines card tricks, gyp­sies, wicca, church, and the like, my mother was epilep­tic, I started from a young age under­stand­ing there is more than meets the eye. I have had two close calls with death, one involv­ing a defibu­la­tor, one from a rip cur­rent in the ocean. I have proven time and time again some­thing wants me to live despite a death wish from time to time. I know I have ESP and have proved it to many peo­ple, am frankly I am tired of skep­tics. I am will­ing to pay you what ever u see fit for your life expe­ri­ence and train­ing though I don’t just want to use this skill to score chicks or get a free lunch I have wanted to serve the greater good for the past ten years. If you or alex gray know any way to show me what I can do to help, what ever, I am all ears. I do believe, I sin­cerely want to help, I would love to acquire new skills, though whats it good for… and why… and how must one hyp­no­tise self to not know so that their isn’t even the thought of let­ting this info leak into mal­ice devi­ous minds… I am all ears senior… jacob micheal BRUNO 805 423 5515

  26. Ted
    September 29, 2009 | 2:33 am

    It seems to me that in games of chance I some­times am able to pre­dict the future. As self cen­tered as it might seem, I would like to learn how to do it every­time I decide to play games off chance. Is it pos­si­ble to RV the future a mere 10 sec­onds or so into the future on a con­sis­tant basis ? I believe it is. What are your thoughts regard­ing games of chance in real time as it relates RV?
    Thanks
    Ted

  27. jonnjenkind
    September 29, 2009 | 4:39 pm

    Ckvr53 I want to say — thank you for this!

  28. Jackson
    September 29, 2009 | 4:43 pm

    Nice one Michael

  29. lilikindsli
    September 29, 2009 | 6:34 pm

    vTokqZ I want to say — thank you for this!

  30. mary josephina
    September 30, 2009 | 8:07 am

    I read about the pick three num­ber choos­ing using RV. I live in Italy and we have Super­Enalotto, Nos 1–90 and to win a jack­pot one has to have all the 6 num­bers in one line and this is the world’s hard­est to hit I have read. Is RV going to help this sit­u­a­tion? Pick three will be an eas­ier one. I get tons of mails and I find one intro­duc­ing another and this same one intro­duc­ing the first one who intro­duced this one in the first place with­out even real­iz­ing the real­ity. In doing this every one tries to sup­port the other and make tons of money. I do not want to be car­ried away like this. Sorry to say I did spend some hard earned money in this process. It is the bit­ter­ness of loos­ing money and being gullible this way by believ­ing all the smart talks of peo­ple who have been blessed with this ability.If you have some­thing worth the while I would like to get to know

  31. lilikindsli
    September 30, 2009 | 8:33 am

    4BC8Q2 I want to say — thank you for this!

  32. jerry
    September 30, 2009 | 2:26 pm

    hello…
    i bought all dvd’s except “fina­cial remote veiwing“and another do not recall the title. Alos, the finan­cial remote for­cast­ing one is not the title,but you get the idea of which one I did not buy.
    I have the 4 dvd’s, pick­ing the lot­trey one,dowsing one, Ed Dames…grim pre­dic­tions. I watched grim predictions.…oh well!!!
    watched the lot­tery one…did not try it,yet!
    watched the dows­ing one(Paul.H.Smith)…will watch again!!
    The 4 dvd’s (Ed Dames) course…I have not watched or attempted to start…Why I do not know.
    None the less, I will soon. I just want to be sure I am doing what I am sup­pose to do. I have to print the forms first.
    I wanted to order the “ufo dvd”, but you no longer offer that one, why is that?
    I would like to buy that one.

    Any­way, I hope soon, to let you all know how,what, I experienced…when I fol­low to the “T” all pro­to­cols in my first “RV” attempt.

  33. E E Codino
    September 30, 2009 | 5:35 pm

    I pur­chased the Ed Dames and I need help in under­stand­ing how to use the DVD.
    I started disc # 1 and I mis­un­der­stood how to get started and now I don’t want to progress to the other discs until I get the first one.
    How do I start over since I already have seen the tar­gets.
    I have the Learn Remote View­ing taught by Ed Dames

  34. Romase
    October 3, 2009 | 5:38 pm

    site best

  35. Wegas
    October 4, 2009 | 3:37 am

    new blog

  36. lilikindsli
    October 5, 2009 | 8:34 am

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!,

  37. lilikindsli
    October 5, 2009 | 8:50 am

    Great. Now i can say thank you!,

  38. lilikindsli
    October 5, 2009 | 9:00 am

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!,

  39. Boewyn
    October 5, 2009 | 9:29 am

    Very cute :-) ))),

  40. Drerralith
    October 5, 2009 | 9:49 am

    Per­fect work!,

  41. Ocenda
    October 5, 2009 | 9:57 am

    Great site. Keep doing.,

  42. Chigosa
    October 5, 2009 | 10:16 am

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.,

  43. Salessi
    October 5, 2009 | 11:23 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!,

  44. Draemma
    October 5, 2009 | 12:36 pm

    Great work,webmaster,nice design!,

  45. Yewiel
    October 5, 2009 | 2:30 pm

    Great work,webmaster,nice design!,

  46. Tharethiel
    October 5, 2009 | 2:46 pm

    It is the coolest site, keep so!,

  47. Niannon
    October 5, 2009 | 3:01 pm

    Great site. Keep doing.,

  48. Verrang
    October 5, 2009 | 3:30 pm

    Great. Now i can say thank you!,

  49. Adedrikoth
    October 5, 2009 | 3:45 pm

    Very cute :-) ))),

  50. Serragord
    October 5, 2009 | 4:00 pm

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!,

  51. Fabrice
    October 6, 2009 | 9:22 am

    The TRN 2345 gave me a young girl dressed with sky­blue shirt and dress, with yel­low hairs, being accom­pa­nied through down a stair­way by ‚i’m not very sure , a woman!the lit­tle girl seems to be lost and was help by that per­son. Hope this helped and is what hap­pend for a missed lit­tle girl!!!

  52. Nawen
    October 6, 2009 | 9:28 am

    It is the coolest site, keep so!,

  53. Gaycia
    October 6, 2009 | 9:41 am

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!,

  54. Paul
    October 6, 2009 | 11:49 am

    Hi Michael,
    I am going through the CD’s for the third time
    and still not feel­ing or any see­ing any­thing dif­fer­end. What am I doing wrong? Paul

  55. Yboendra
    October 6, 2009 | 12:07 pm

    I want to say — thank you for this!,

  56. Boewyn
    October 6, 2009 | 12:37 pm

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.,

  57. Nirwen
    October 7, 2009 | 2:30 pm

    Per­fect work!,

  58. jokli
    October 8, 2009 | 2:45 pm

    hel­llo kinda lost here

  59. Joel
    October 10, 2009 | 10:27 pm

    mmmmh… I’m still with Gary too, i have no clue about what Remote View­ing is…?¿

  60. Buy Orlistat
    October 12, 2009 | 12:56 am

    This blog is really inter­est­ing! Cheap Orli­s­tat

  61. loan
    October 12, 2009 | 2:47 am

    cool nice site

  62. AutoalesMan
    October 13, 2009 | 5:46 am

    WOW, great info.
    i love get­ting informed and expand­ing my knowl­edge on com­puter pro­grams and soft­ware.
    im sub­scrib­ing, please keep the info com­ing…
    thanks

    [url=http://www.rain-clouds.com/Costs.html]craigslist pro­gram cost[/url]

  63. Groebard
    October 15, 2009 | 5:36 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  64. Etilic
    October 15, 2009 | 6:02 am

    Great site. Keep doing.

  65. Salep
    October 15, 2009 | 6:28 am

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  66. Alendali
    October 15, 2009 | 6:55 am

    Per­fect work!

  67. Adwelath
    October 15, 2009 | 7:25 am

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  68. Biebwyn
    October 15, 2009 | 7:54 am

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!

  69. Eowedrivudd
    October 15, 2009 | 8:24 am

    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.

  70. Cadab
    October 15, 2009 | 8:55 am

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  71. Griremar
    October 15, 2009 | 9:27 am

    Very cute :-) )))

  72. Ceririd
    October 15, 2009 | 10:30 am

    Great work,webmaster,nice design!

  73. Bacan
    October 15, 2009 | 11:00 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  74. Thoiba
    October 15, 2009 | 11:27 am

    Great site. Keep doing.

  75. Biradus
    October 15, 2009 | 11:55 am

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  76. Dwaoth
    October 15, 2009 | 12:23 pm

    Per­fect work!

  77. Ciamas
    October 15, 2009 | 12:48 pm

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  78. Ferrahar
    October 15, 2009 | 1:36 pm

    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.

  79. Kedaut
    October 15, 2009 | 2:00 pm

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  80. Afoeth
    October 15, 2009 | 2:25 pm

    Very cute :-) )))

  81. Umaowyr
    October 15, 2009 | 2:50 pm

    It is the coolest site, keep so!

  82. Sardobwyn
    October 15, 2009 | 3:13 pm

    Great work,webmaster,nice design!

  83. Ron Fischer
    October 15, 2009 | 3:37 pm

    I have been faci­nated with remote view­ing con­cepts for many years. I too have had sim­i­lar expe­ri­ences as Michael Jura. It would be fab­u­lous to learn how to con­trol what­ever it is I have been expe­ri­enc­ing. Is that possible?

  84. Eowalidric
    October 15, 2009 | 3:59 pm

    Great site. Keep doing.

  85. Ethendawin
    October 15, 2009 | 4:20 pm

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  86. Eromadan
    October 15, 2009 | 4:43 pm

    Per­fect work!

  87. Crore
    October 15, 2009 | 5:07 pm

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  88. Wedrild
    October 15, 2009 | 5:30 pm

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!

  89. Ulohaf
    October 15, 2009 | 5:51 pm

    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.

  90. Etonnon
    October 15, 2009 | 6:14 pm

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  91. Rhiaron
    October 15, 2009 | 6:37 pm

    Very cute :-) )))

  92. Palis
    October 15, 2009 | 7:01 pm

    It is the coolest site, keep so!

  93. Gwalesean
    October 15, 2009 | 7:24 pm

    Great work,webmaster,nice design!

  94. Aligoldan
    October 15, 2009 | 8:11 pm

    Great site. Keep doing.

  95. Adrilacan
    October 15, 2009 | 8:36 pm

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  96. Lohand
    October 15, 2009 | 9:27 pm

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  97. Gomatrem
    October 15, 2009 | 9:51 pm

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!

  98. Astalebard
    October 15, 2009 | 10:43 pm

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  99. Nydaler
    October 15, 2009 | 11:09 pm

    Very cute :-) )))

  100. Chalis
    October 16, 2009 | 12:29 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  101. Mirwen
    October 16, 2009 | 12:56 am

    Great site. Keep doing.

  102. Loithien
    October 16, 2009 | 1:21 am

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  103. Cirari
    October 16, 2009 | 1:48 am

    Per­fect work!

  104. Priallan
    October 16, 2009 | 2:14 am

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  105. Jererawen
    October 16, 2009 | 2:41 am

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!

  106. Ailiven
    October 16, 2009 | 3:06 am

    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.

  107. Aboviel
    October 16, 2009 | 3:33 am

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  108. Cadilia
    October 16, 2009 | 3:58 am

    Very cute :-) )))

  109. Haaecia
    October 16, 2009 | 4:24 am

    It is the coolest site, keep so!

  110. Asaen
    October 16, 2009 | 5:19 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  111. Aemma
    October 16, 2009 | 5:45 am

    Great site. Keep doing.

  112. Larirelind
    October 16, 2009 | 6:13 am

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  113. Aidia
    October 16, 2009 | 6:39 am

    Per­fect work!

  114. Rigossa
    October 16, 2009 | 7:07 am

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  115. Ethardocien
    October 16, 2009 | 8:36 am

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  116. Afeawen
    October 16, 2009 | 9:05 am

    Very cute :-) )))

  117. Proimeth
    October 16, 2009 | 9:36 am

    It is the coolest site, keep so!

  118. Verrang
    October 16, 2009 | 10:35 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  119. Zima
    October 16, 2009 | 11:03 am

    Great site. Keep doing.

  120. Braulian
    October 16, 2009 | 12:00 pm

    Per­fect work!

  121. Ulilaviel
    October 16, 2009 | 12:24 pm

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  122. Ledien
    October 16, 2009 | 12:45 pm

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!

  123. Adiwia
    October 16, 2009 | 1:44 pm

    Very cute :-) )))

  124. Dayviel
    October 16, 2009 | 3:18 pm

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  125. Waliwia
    October 16, 2009 | 6:07 pm

    Great site. Keep doing.

  126. Ethoasa
    October 16, 2009 | 6:41 pm

    Per­fect work!

  127. Edyvia
    October 16, 2009 | 6:57 pm

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  128. Aferran
    October 16, 2009 | 7:30 pm

    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.

  129. Caowen
    October 16, 2009 | 8:21 pm

    It is the coolest site, keep so!

  130. Trenna
    October 16, 2009 | 8:38 pm

    Great work,webmaster,nice design!

  131. Hebeth
    October 16, 2009 | 8:55 pm

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  132. Adwuclya
    October 16, 2009 | 9:30 pm

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  133. Cesien
    October 16, 2009 | 9:47 pm

    Per­fect work!

  134. Cadaymeth
    October 16, 2009 | 10:23 pm

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!

  135. Etea
    October 16, 2009 | 11:00 pm

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  136. Edilihar
    October 16, 2009 | 11:37 pm

    It is the coolest site, keep so!

  137. Lothoa
    October 17, 2009 | 12:14 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  138. Cadia
    October 17, 2009 | 12:34 am

    Great site. Keep doing.

  139. Tomader
    October 17, 2009 | 12:53 am

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  140. Biarid
    October 17, 2009 | 2:30 am

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  141. Wicaomar
    October 17, 2009 | 3:43 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  142. Etedrican
    October 17, 2009 | 4:20 am

    Very inter­est­ing site. Hope it will always be alive!

  143. paulina
    October 17, 2009 | 4:53 am

    i do not under­stand how this will attract thing u want in life

  144. Corewyth
    October 17, 2009 | 4:58 am

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  145. Afoik
    October 17, 2009 | 5:17 am

    I book­marked this link. Thank you for good job!

  146. Ybiabaen
    October 17, 2009 | 5:55 am

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  147. Jayder
    October 17, 2009 | 7:11 am

    I want to say — thank you for this!

  148. Aleric
    October 17, 2009 | 8:10 am

    Per­fect work!

  149. Jeroha
    October 17, 2009 | 8:30 am

    Excel­lent site. It was pleas­ant to me.

  150. Jeriewyr
    October 17, 2009 | 9:32 am

    Great. Now i can say thank you!

  151. carole cornock
    October 17, 2009 | 7:37 pm

    Like every­one else I didn’t under­stand the tar­get num­bers until I read your expla­na­tion.
    Thanks Michael

  152. Arlene
    October 20, 2009 | 3:00 am

    What do you have to do to set the mind in the right way to be open to RV. There is always a lot of noise such as chil­dren talk­ing, t.v play­ing can you do it in a env­ior­ment as such are do you need it to be quiet?

  153. best canadian pharmacy
    October 21, 2009 | 7:57 am

    Great. Now i can say thank you

  154. orderocax
    October 22, 2009 | 5:27 pm

    Hi! Sorry klooper in F7*&%^! place of my eng­lish jer, buti dan­ged unset­tled re put about .

  155. order xanax
    October 29, 2009 | 3:38 pm

    very grace your site.

  156. Spyware Blocking
    November 18, 2009 | 2:10 pm

    I only want to tell you thanks for all the great info found on your blog, even helped me with my work recently :) keep it up!

  157. Tina
    December 1, 2009 | 1:44 pm

    If we’re using ran­dom tar­get ref­er­ence num­bers, how do we know if we’re view­ing the right thing? Where do we get the con­fir­ma­tion?
    Thanks

Trackbacks/Pingbacks
  1. Attorney in meade offering legal service to those suffering from malignant mesothelioma
Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://blog.remoteviewingprojectx.com/target-reference-numbers/trackback/